Lucy Dickson v. Charles Slade. Circuit Court Report Jennifer Guiliano Trevor Muñoz William G. Thomas III transcription and encoding Steph N. Camerone Kaci L. Nash Laura K. Weakly University of Nebraska-Lincoln University of Maryland National Endowment for the Humanities 2016 O Say Can You See University of Nebraska-Lincoln Center for Digital Research in the Humanities
319 Love Library University of Nebraska–Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-4100 cdrh@unl.edu
oscys.report.0046.001 oscys.caseid.0392 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Derivatives must be credited to O Say Can You See, made available non-commercially, and distributed under the same terms. Requests for permission for commercial publication or other use should be emailed to the project team.

 Reports of Cases Civil and Criminal in the United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia, from 1801 to 1841 William Cranch Little, Brown and Company Volume I 1852 Boston Supplementary Documents Court Report Civil Petition for Freedom July 1807 Bowie Gantt, John Mackall, 1762-1811 Lyles, Ann Lowry Lyles, William Henry Lyles, William Prince George's County (Md.) Dickson, Lucy Slade, Charles Jones, Walter, 1776-1861 Lee, Edmund J. United States. Circuit Court (District of Columbia) Alexandria (Washington, D.C.) added xml:ids reviewed; edited transcribed; encoded

Mulatto Lucy v. Charles Slade.

A deed conveying or transferring a slave in Maryland, not recorded, cannot be given in evidence without proof of its execution, although it has been acknowledged before a justice of the peace in Maryland.

The oath, required by the Virginia law of the 17th of December, 1792, § 4, is of no avail unless taken within sixty days after the removal of the party.

Trespass, for assault and battery and false imprisonment, to try the right of freedom.

Mr. E. J. Lee, for the defendants, offered a deed of gift of the plaintiff by Colonel William Lyles to Miss Ann Lowery, whom W. H. Lyles afterwards married, acknowledged before Mr. Bowie, a justice of the peace of Prince George's county, Maryland, and a certificate of the clerk of Prince George's county, that Mr. Bowie was on the at day a qualified justice of the peace, and a certificate of J. M. Gantt, chief judge of the court of Prince George’s, &c.

Mr. Jones, for the plaintiff, objected that is it no act, nor record, nor a judicial proceeding. It is not recorded, and if it has been, yet as it is not required to be recorded, it would gain no authenticity by the recording. It is not necessary to be acknowledged. The taking of an acknowledgment is not a judicial act.

The Court (nem. con.) decided that it was not evidence, unless proved by witnesses. The acknowledgment of the deed, at all events, can amount to no more than an estoppel against the party himself, who has acknowledged, and does not prevent another person from denying the execution of the deed.

The court also permitted the plaintiff to give evidence of an importation by Colonel William Lyles, under a general allegation in the statement of the case, prepared by counsel under the order of the Court; whereupon the defendant gave in evidence a certificate of an oath taken by William H. Lyles; but the Court instructed the jury that the said oath was not in compliance with the Virginia Act of Assembly of 17th December, 1792, § 4, p. 86, unless taken within sixty days after the removal of W. H. Lyles.