Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Derivatives must be credited to O Say Can You See, made available non-commercially, and distributed under the same terms. Requests for permission for commercial publication or other use should be emailed to the project team.
The State of Maryland Sct.
At a General Court of the said State, one of the United States of America begun and held for the Western Shore at the City of Annapolis on the Second Tuesday of May being the thirteenth day of the same month in the Eighteenth year of the Independence of the said United States of America and in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and ninety four.
Present
The Honorable Samuel Chase, Esquire chief Judge
Robert Goldsborough and Jeremiah Townley Chase Esquire Judges
William Goldsmith Esquire Sheriff. John Gwinn Clk
In the record of the proceedings of the same court among others is the following towit.
Edward Queen
against
Reverend John Ashton
Be it Remembered that on the fifteenth day of October in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and ninety one Edward Queen by Gabriel Duvall his attorney exhibits to the Judges of the General court here in court sitting his Petition for freedom against the Reverend John Ashton in the words and figures following towit.
To the Honorable The Judges of the General Court.
The Petition of Edward Queen humbly sheweth that he is held in slavery by the Revd. John Ashton altho he is informed he is entitled to his freedom being descended from a free woman, vizt. being the son of Phillis who was the Daughter of Mary Queen commonly called Queen Mary, a free woman; he therefore prays your Honours to direct summons to issue against the said John Ashton returnable immediately to answer the premises; & that your honours, the facts being proved will adjudge your petitioner to be free; and he will pray & soforth.
G Duvall
P B Key for Petr.
Whereupon it is ordered by the court here that the said Reverand John Ashton do not remove the aforesaid Edward Queen out of this State, nor obstruct him from attending this court from time to time in support of his Petition for freedom preferred against him the said John Ashton and in the mean time to feed, cloath and use the said Petitioner well; And at the prayer of the aforesaid Edward Queen by Gabriel Duvall and Philip Barton Key his attornies aforesaid Summons is ordered by the court here to issue to the Sheriff of Anne Arundel County against the aforesaid John Ashton to answer the Petition aforesaid which accordingly issued in the words and figures following towit.
The State of Maryland, Sct. To the Sheriff of Anne Arundel County, Greeting. We command you that you summon the Reverend John Ashton that all delays and excuses set aside he be and appear before the Judges of our General Court at Annapolis immediately to answer unto the Petition of Edward Queen preferred against him for freedom; hereof he is not to fail and fail not at your peril and have you then and there this writ. Witness The Honorable Samuel Chase Esquire chief Judge of our said Court the 11th day of October Anno Domini 1791.
Issued the 17th day of October 1791. GD Jno. Gwinn Clk
And the Sheriff of Anne Arundel County to whom the aforegoing precept was made and directed comes and makes return thereof to the court here thus endorsed to wit.
Sd. J. Williams Shff.
And the aforesaid Reverend John Ashton by William Cooke his attorney comes and defends the complaint aforesaid when
At which said next court towit, the second Tuesday of October being the ninth day of the same month in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and ninety two, comes again here into our General Court as well the aforesaid Edward Queen by his Attornies aforesaid as the aforesaid John Ashton by his attorney aforesaid: and the aforesaid Edward Queen by his Attornies aforesaid filed in court here the following Depositions towit.
Edward Queen
a
John Ashton
Petition for Freedom in the General Court.
Richard Disney of Anne Arundel County aged seventy five years being duly sworn on the Holy Evangelist of Almighty God, to say the truth of his knowledge in this cause saith, that he knows Phillis and Nanny Cooper who belong to the Defendant, and has known them ever since he was a child. And Phillis is a Mulatto, and Nanny Cooper as black as most negroes; but he does not remember the Mother of Phillis and Nanny; and this deponent knew James Carroll who formerly lived at Fingal, very well, and this Deponent's Mother who is now dead, was a midwife, and has often told him that the aforesaid Nanny was the first child she ever took, and was very well acquainted in the said James Carroll's family and she attended the family many years as a midwife, and he has often heard her say, that is was a shame that the mother of Phillis and Nanny was kept in slavery, and if Mr Carroll would be false in one thing, he would be false in another; And this Deponent remembers to have heard a great deal of talk about her and has heard divers persons say that Captain Larkin brought her into this country and that she had a great many fine Cloaths and that old William Chapman took her a shore once and it was noised about that there was a fine Lady from
J.S. Belt.
Edward Queen
v
The Revd. John Ashton
Petition for freedom in the General Court.
The Deposition of Thomas Warfield aged forty two years or thereabouts, being sworn on the Holy Evangely of Almighty God saith that about the year seventeen hundred and eighty two or seventeen hundred & eighty three this Deponent was overseer at Bright Seat in Anne Arundel County for the late Reverend John Carroll and had carried down six Hogsheads of Tobacco for the said John Carroll to Taylor's Landing warehouse where Capt. John Jiams, now deceased, was Inspector, and the said Inspector was going to mark the Tobacco with the name of the Deponent when the Deponent told him not, but to mark it with the name of John Carroll, priest, upon which the said Capt. John Jiams asked him what he to do with priest Carroll to which the Deponent answered he was overseer for him; the said John Jiams then asked the Deponent if he knew old Phillis who lived at the quarter, to which he answered that he did know
Sworn to before the subscriber this 11th Oct. 1792.
James Mackubin.
And the aforesaid John Ashton by his attorney aforesaid as before defends the complaint aforesaid when and where the court shall take the same into consideration and prays further leave of the court to imparle hereunto untill next court; and he hath it: the same day is given to the Petitioner also.
At which said next court towit the second Tuesday of May being the fourteenth day of the same month in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and ninety three comes again here into our General Court as well the aforesaid Edward Queen by his attornies aforesaid as the aforesaid John Ashton by his attorney aforesaid: and the aforesaid Edward Queen
Edward Queen
against
John Ashton
Petition for Freedom in the General Court.
George Davis of Anne Arundel County aged fifty four years and upwards being sworn on the Holy Evangely of Almighty God to testify the truth of his knowledge in this cause deposeth and saith that he has known Ned the Petitioner for many years, and he has known Phillis who now lives with Mr Ashton for about twenty years; and he further saith that between Twenty one and Twenty two years ago, the Deponent happened at John Atwell's who then lived on the Land now owned by Thomas Duckett near Mr Ashton's, and Ned the Petitioner passed by, and Lewis Lee who lived in Anne Arundel County was present and when Ned the Petitioner was passing the Deponent observed how many Mulattoes there were at the priests to which the said Lewis Lee answered yes, and said that, that Lad pointing at Ned, ought to be free, for his grandmother was a free woman: Being asked if he knew the grandmother of Ned? Answers he did not know any thing about her he further saith that Mrs. Atwell wife of the aforesaid John Atwell asked the said Lewis Lee several questions about her (meaning the grandmother of Ned) and Lewis Lee made answer, the substance of which he does not recollect except that he said that Capt Larkin brought her in: Being asked if he remembers that the said Lee mentioned where she was brought from? Answers he does not.
being asked if Lewis Lee mentioned the name of Neds Grandmother? Says he did not nor where she lived nor how he got his Information
Sworn before me this 27th May 1793. Allen Quynn
And the aforesaid John Ashton by his attorney aforesaid as before defends the complaint aforesaid when and where the court shall take the same into consideration, and prays further leave of the court to imparle hereunto untill next court; and he hath it: the same day is given to the Petitioner also. At which said next court towit, the second Tuesday
Edward Queen
against
John Ashton
Petition for Freedom in the General Court.
Caleb Clarke of Prince George's County aged forty seven years being sworn on the Holy Evangely of Almighty God, deposeth and saith that he knows Ned the Petitioner, and the Defendant, and has known them both for many years: that he knows Phillis a mulatto woman who lives with the said John Ashton but does not know that she is the mother of Ned; Being asked if he knew the grandmother of Ned? Answers he never did. That he has often heard his mother, Mary Clarke, who has been dead about eight years, and was about sixty nine years old when she died, say that a yellow woman called Mary Queen was brought into this country by Captain Larkin as she had been frequently told by her Father Marsh Mareen Duvall: that the said Larkin frequented her said Father's House, and was known by his said mother; that James Carroll also frequented it: and the said Carroll and his the Deponents grandfather lived within sight of each other; and he has heard his mother say often in conversation that the said Mary Queen was owned by the said James Carroll, and that her father had often heard the said James Carroll and Mary Queen quarrelling and wrangling about her freedom as he had told her that the said James Carroll would say to her, poh! have patience you will be free by and by, or you will get your freedom, by and by or words to that effect, and would promise what he would do for her; that he has often heard The same from his Aunt Fowler who was his mother's sister, and from his Aunt Carrick another sister, and also from John Carrick husband of his Aunt Carrick that his said Aunts were up across the Bay to him. And further he saith not.
Allen Quynn
Thereupon further process of and upon the premisses aforesaid between the parties aforesaid by consent of the same parties and their Attornies aforesaid and by order of the court here thereon is continued untill the second Tuesday of May next following.
And now here at this day towit the said second Tuesday of May being the thirteenth day of the same month in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and ninety four comes again here into our General Court as well the aforesaid Edward Queen by his attornies aforesaid as the aforesaid John Ashton by his attorney aforesaid: and the aforesaid John Ashton by his attorney aforesaid files in court here the following Deposition and Extract of James Carroll's will towit.
The Deposition of Deborah Lusby of Anne Arundel County about fifty years of age being first duly sworn deposeth and saith that she is the Daughter of Edward Lee and well knew his Brother Lewis Lee and Robt. Welch who were very old men when they respectively died who all lived in the neighbourhood of James Carroll's Plantation called Fingall where old Phillis the respected reputed slave of James Carroll also died lived, that this deponent well knows old Phillis and knew her about thirty years past but never heard the said Phillis or any of her Descendants were intitled to be free; or that they claimed Freedom until very lately. This Deponent further
Deborah Lusby
her + mark
Sworn before me the 21st day of March 1794 the Deponent Deborah Lusby having first signed the same.
John Randall
I bequeath to my cousin Anthony Carroll now with me two negroes vizt. Henry and Mary to be delivered if alive to him the tenth of October after my decease the better to enable him to seat his five hundred acres of Land which is to be laid out in a convenient form where he shall think fit to seat if he settles first.
In Testimony that the above is a true extract from the will of James Carroll bearing date
Jno. Gassaway Reg Wills AA Coty
And the said John by his attorney aforesaid (admitting that the said Edward is descended from Mary Queen mentioned in the said Petition) comes and says that the said Mary Queen the Grand Mother of the Petitioner from whom by Descent the Petitioner claims his freedom always was a Slave: and this the said John is ready to verify: without that, that the said Mary was free as alledged by the said Petition. And the said Edward by his attorney aforesaid saith that the said Mary Queen was not a Slave at the time of the Birth of the Issue of Mary Queen from whom the said Edward is descended as the said John above in pleading hath alledged: and this the said Edward prays may be enquired of by the country and soforth: and the said John doth the like. Therefore let a Jury thereupon appear before the court here immediately by whom andsoforth, and who neither andsoforth to recognize and soforth, because as well and so forth, who being called come that is to say; John Truman, John Cray McCubbin, Walter Billingsley, Archibald Robinson, Robert Gover, James Cresap, James Matthews, Benjamin West, Richard Beall Junior, Spencer Cooper, Tilghman Hilleary and Richard Merrikin, who being elected, tried and sworn to say the truth in the premises upon their Oath do say, that the said Mary Queen the Grandmother of the Petitioner was not a Slave; and that he the said Edward Queen the Petitioner is descended from the said Mary Queen in manner and form as he the said Edward Queen in his said Petition to the court here preferred against the aforesaid John Ashton hath alledged.
Therefore it is adjudged by the court here that the said Edward Queen the Petitioner aforesaid be hence freed and discharged of and from the service of the aforesaid Reverend
It is also considered by the court here that the said Edward Queen the Petitioner recover against the aforesaid Reverend John Ashton the quantity of one thousand nine hundred and ninety seven pounds of Tobacco by the court here unto him the said Edward Queen the Petitioner aforesaid on his assent adjudged for his costs and charges by him about his Prosecution of the Petition aforesaid in this behalf laid out and expended: and that he have thereof his execution against the aforesaid John Ashton soforth.
Memorandum, Judgment was rendered in this cause on the twenty third day of May in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and ninety four
Test John Gwinn Clk
The State of Maryland Sct.
I hereby certify that the aforegoing is truly taken from the Record of Proceedings of the General Court of the Western Shore of the State aforesaid.
In Testimony whereof I have to this Exemplification (the same being first duly Stamped) set my hand and affixed the seal of the said General Court this fifteenth day of March in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and ninety eight, and in the twenty third year of the Independence of the United States of America.
John Gwinn Clk
Genl. Court. W Shore S of Maryland
Edward Queen
vs
Revd. John Ashton
Record
No. 1
Cost £2.12.O Cmy
8$ 7 May
Fild. 26 May 1801